Analysis: Sequester Affects Large Cities and Military Communities More Than Suburban and Urban Areas

by Colonel on March 4, 2013

“Interviews with more than a dozen state and municipal leaders coast to coast show that the sequester would afflict big cities and military communities — because of cuts to social programs and defense — far more than middle-class suburbs or rural areas. The disparity in some ways mirrors the nation’s electoral divide between Democrats and Republicans.

The discrepancies help explain why House Republicans — many of whom represent rural and outer suburban districts — feel little urgency to strike a deal with Obama and avert the sequester. They also suggest that the misery expected Friday would not be universal, meaning that public outcry may not be loud or widespread enough to propel Washington toward a quick solution.

The cuts are split evenly between the defense budget and non-defense discretionary spending, which includes many federal grants to state and local agencies.

” — Philip Rucker, Copyright 2013 The Washington Post Company

Previous post:

Next post:

Page 1 of 11